登录
  • #老生常谈

Reviewer坑爹

heguanda2
1394
1
这学期投了篇APL,运气不好,被分到了两个reviewer,昨天出了结果。

第一个reviewer早早的交了review,给了minor revision。第二个哥们拖拖拉拉,搞了一个多月才搞定。结果这个B看了一个半月毛都没看懂,给了poor,真是坑爹!

还好主编明鉴,采用了第一个reviewer的意见,擦

你们看看这第二个哥们

Reviewer #2 Evaluations:

RECOMMENDATION: Reject

Paper Interesting: No

Original Paper: Yes

Sufficient Physics: No

Well Organized: No

Clear and Error Free: No

Conclusions Supported: No

Appropriate Title: Yes

Good Abstract: No

Satisfactory English: Yes

Adequate References: No

Clear Figures: Yes

OVERALL RATING: Poor

Reviewer #2 (Comments to the Author):

The authors describe impedometric analysis for artificial sweat in order to characterize human sweat in terms of the electrical variation upon the changes of electrolyte composition. In the paper the impedance measurement for the artificial sweat, and home-made conductometric sweat sensor were demonstrated. Sweat analysis and its sensory systems have been studied for more than a century, and there are lots of sweat sensors providing much information for human body with ease-of-use manner. It is ambiguous what this work aims, and inconsistent in the experimental work flow; at the first they claimed to analyze liquid electrolytes with impedometry, and then they suddenly fabricated tubular test sensor for sweat detection. i think this paper has lack of scientific interest, and even premature for publication anywhere. I don't recommend it for publication in APL.

还EVEN premature for publication anywhere, 我真是想要抽他......
1条回复
热度排序

发表回复