综合写作TPO13 求改
15881
The lecture apparently refutes what is argued in the reading material. According to the passage, the private collectors will damage the study of fossils because that public can not see them, scientists lose necessary discoveries and owners will damage testimony. However the speaker asserts that a closer scrutiny will reveal how flimsy it is. He then presents several proofs to demonstrate his statement.
To start with, the instructor claims that the reading passage fails to take into account that there will be available for public to see bones because of hunting. The school and library can also display fossils for public to look. Therefore, the assertion of the author seems too absolute since other possibilities could not be eliminated by any current evidence.
Furthermore,the reading assumes that specialists will lose the indispensable findings. The presenter, nevertheless, suggests that this assumption may not be merited by the evidence. Say, the fossils must be passed to scientists first to identify and investigate. So, it is impossible to omit many useful information since doyens could perform and get vital details.
Last but not least, the passage may be right about the omission of locations or gestures, yet one critical fact is being left out of consideration. Pointed out by the professor, all these important fossils could not be unearthed if collectors don not dig them. It will be a more dire waste including not only places but details which we can acquire after digging it.
In conclusion, on account of above-mentioned grave mistakes, the professor clearly identifies the defects in the reading material and forcefully shows that it will be advantageous improvement for both if private collectors sell and buy fossils.
To start with, the instructor claims that the reading passage fails to take into account that there will be available for public to see bones because of hunting. The school and library can also display fossils for public to look. Therefore, the assertion of the author seems too absolute since other possibilities could not be eliminated by any current evidence.
Furthermore,the reading assumes that specialists will lose the indispensable findings. The presenter, nevertheless, suggests that this assumption may not be merited by the evidence. Say, the fossils must be passed to scientists first to identify and investigate. So, it is impossible to omit many useful information since doyens could perform and get vital details.
Last but not least, the passage may be right about the omission of locations or gestures, yet one critical fact is being left out of consideration. Pointed out by the professor, all these important fossils could not be unearthed if collectors don not dig them. It will be a more dire waste including not only places but details which we can acquire after digging it.
In conclusion, on account of above-mentioned grave mistakes, the professor clearly identifies the defects in the reading material and forcefully shows that it will be advantageous improvement for both if private collectors sell and buy fossils.
1条回复