登录
  • #老生常谈

我导‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‍‍‌‍‍‍‌师给我的回信--How to write a critics

superwangxp
7449
29
最近闲的无聊,于是给那边老师写信要给点建议。老师让开始读他们组的paper,并写个one-paper的critics。

遂激动之,半天读完文章,半天写好一个summary, 最后写了点limitation。。

没想到教授给我的回信比我写的还长,汗一个~~

废话少说,我把它分享给大家,一方面也许对研究有帮助,另一方面可能对陶瓷也有指导吧,呵呵。。

Dear superwang,

It's a good summary, with too many nice words.

What I expect is critical review.

But critical review is more than a summary of the paper.

You will need to develop real understanding of the material, and evaluate, and offer critical comment on the ideas and information that the author(s) presents in the article.

We will need to identify:

-- the research question (usually stated in the Abstract and Introduction)

-- the hypothesis(es) (usually in the Introduction)

-- the test of the hypothesis (in the Methods)

-- the findings (in the Results, including tables and figures)

-- how the findings were interpreted (in the Discussion)

You may start with tese questions:

-- What is interesting about this information?

-- How does the author(s) support the hypothesis?

-- What is the main aim of the article?

-- Is the article timely?

-- Is the argument / thesis convincing? Is the evidence valid?

-- How does the study design address the thesis?

-- What are the controls for each experiment?

-- Is the methodology appropriate? Any weaknesses?

-- Are the results convincing? Is it comprehensive and through?

-- What questions remain unanswered? Anything omitted?

-- Are the findings presented and described clearly and fully?

-- Could the data be interpreted in another way?

-- How does the article contribute to the field? Does it make an original contribution to the field?

Although the papers you're evaluating are from my group, I'd like to hear more critics and constructive comments. You may give yourself a little bit more time to consume the material before you revise your review.
29条回复
热度排序

发表回复